In full view of the following circumstances admitted by the lower court and the lower court based on the evidence duly admitted and examined, the instant facts charged can be fully recognized, and each of the statements of D and H alone is insufficient to reverse the said recognition. Therefore, the Defendant’s above assertion is without merit.

① The victim, from the police to the court of the trial, has made a very specific and consistent statement to the effect that he/she suffered an injury by assault from the Defendant, as stated in the facts charged.

In light of the fact that the victim was unaware of the defendant's personal information at the time of the instant case and there is no motive or reason to gather the defendant, the victim's above statement is credibility.

② On the following day of the instant case, the recording of the medical certificate of injury issued by the victim (as evidence No. 6 pages) and the images of each photograph (Evidence No. 116-117 pages) taken by the victim are consistent with the victim’s above statement.

There is a circumstance that the victim suffers another injury due to violence from a third party, etc.

There is no special circumstance to reject the probative value of the above injury diagnosis report, such as the fact that the doctor or the doctor has prepared a false diagnosis report.

③ From the police station to the court of the court below, the victim’s male-friendly job offers F was consistently and consistently stated to the effect that “At the time of arrival at the site of this case, the victim was in excess of the middle of the stairs and was working for the defendant in its surroundings. During the process of following the Defendant’s sexual intercourse, the Defendant and the Defendant were in conflict with each other. The victim was boomed with the victim, and the victim was boomed by assault from the Defendant.”

4. The Defendant