except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

"2014 Highest 8809"

1. On January 26, 2013, the Defendant, at the Defendant’s house located in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, and the third floor, posted a notice to the Internet NAVER’s “China” camera, thereby selling 4,50,000 won,” and made a false notice to the Defendant, who reported and contacted the notice, sent legos to the victim B with money deposited.

However, even if the defendant receives the money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to sell the money normally to the victim.

The Defendant received 650,000 won from the victim to his own bank account (D).

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On January 28, 2013, the Defendant: (a) sent a false statement to the Internet NAVER’s “China” car page; and (b) sent a false statement to the victim E who reported and contacted the statement to the effect that the Defendant would deposit money to the victim E.

However, even if the defendant receives the money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to sell the money normally to the victim.

The Defendant received 445,00 won from the victim to his own bank account (D) in return for the settlement of money.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

3. On February 4, 2013, the Defendant’s fraud against the Victim F, by accessing the Internet NAVVV “China” camera, posted the victim F’s phrase “to purchase the 1021 product straw,” and the victim F’s phone call, and the Defendant said that “I will send 10,000 won and 1.521 product to the victim F at home”.

However, even if the defendant receives money from the victim, he/she shall receive the money from the victim.