If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On August 5, 2012, the Defendant posted a letter on the Internet portal site C bulletin board of the Internet portal site, and falsely sent 2.50,000 won to the victim D who reported and contacted the above letter, “I will send 2.50,000 won in advance to the victim D who sent 2.50,000 won in advance.”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to sell ozone, even if he receives a prepaid payment from the victim because of the lack of a heavy ozone.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 250,000 won from the national bank account in the name of the Defendant on the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing entry and withdrawal;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Detention at a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Provisional payment order: The punishment shall be determined as shown in the order, considering the fact that it is against the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the amount of fraud is 250,000 won, the victim does not want the punishment against the defendant by repaying damage, the age of the defendant, etc., and then is a crime during the repeated crime period; and