[Criminal Power] The Defendant, on January 4, 2018, has been sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a crime, etc. at the Suwon District Court for ten months and the same year.

2. 9. The same court sentenced each of 8 months of imprisonment for fraud, etc., and completed the execution of the sentence in the Ansan prison on December 26 of the same year.

In addition, on August 10, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. on June 18, 2018, and the judgment became final and conclusive on August 18, 201, and is still

【Criminal Facts】

1. Larceny;

A. On January 20, 2019, at around 11:50 on January 20, 2019, the Defendant: (a) stated, “Along with the victim D (the 13-year-old-old-gu Seoul Jung-gu) of the said temporary protection room, the Defendant sent the same temporary protection room to the victim D; (b) “I wish to leave the mobile phone and cash to B; (c) I want to leave the same temporary protection room first; and (d) held the victim’s 2.60,000 won mobile phone and one cash 10,000 won of the market price from the victim.”

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

B. On March 28, 2019, the Defendant is guilty of larceny.

3. Around 15:30 on the street in the 28th 15:30 on the street, the victim G (the 16-year-old age) called “to change mobile phone cases” to the victim’s G (the 800,000 won-end mobile phone number). In that on the street, the victim got a cell phone of 80,000 won at the market price from the victim and took it as it is.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

2. On February 2019, the Defendant posted a letter stating that “Aphone 8 Plphones are sold” on the Internet site “H” and a photo of hphone 8 Plphones, and the same month.

4. Around 13:53, the victim J, who reported and contacted the above writing at the Gela-gun Iel-gun of Seongbuk-gu, Gyeongdong-gun, concluded that “If you send KRW 300,000,00,000, I will send Aphone 8 P phone phone to door-to door-door.”

However, in fact, the defendant was thought to use the mobile phone sales proceeds from the victim as living expenses, etc., and the defendant did not have the 8 Popphones mobile phone.