A, in four months of imprisonment, the defendant limited liability companyB shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

except that this judgment.

Defendant

A is the head of the site of the “E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-K.

1. Defendant A

A. The Defendant, as the head of the construction site site of a limited company B, conducted the work using dump trucks, such as dump trucks, (i) conducted a prior investigation, etc. into the topography, ground, and ground surface of the workplace, and subsequent work should be conducted in order to prevent the risk of workers due to the decline of the relevant machinery, ground collapse, etc.; and (ii) conducted a subsequent work plan; and (iii) placed the leading person in cases where workers are likely to be at risk due to the dump sump sump sump sump sump sump sump sump sump sump sump sump sump sump sump sump sump sump sump, etc. on May 15, 2013; and the victim was sump sump sump sump sump sump sump.

B. The Defendant did not set such a restriction speed, despite the fact that the Defendant, when doing work using a vehicle-based construction machinery at the date and time stated in paragraph 1(a) and at a place, set the restriction speed appropriate for the topography and ground conditions of the working place in advance.

2. Defendant B is a corporation established for the purpose of reinforced concrete construction business.

The defendant, who is the on-site director, failed to take safety measures as above with respect to the defendant's business at the same time and place as paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The written opinion on the investigation into serious accidents; and