When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On August 5, 2016, the Defendant: (a) found the taxi box located in C, which was under the influence of alcohol on August 22 and 30, 2016, and had a taxi engineer and a scambling, but did not resolve the police officer; (b) fluently 50 minutes of the disturbance, and fluenced or scamed by very rough words and behavior at a public office.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A report on internal investigation and a statement of the circumstances of the main agent;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as photograph of criminal scene;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on the Punishment of Minor Offenses, and Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, and Selection of fines for the crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the Defendant was able to escape 50 minutes or a disturbance at the police box under the influence of alcohol, and thus, the crime does not be less light: Provided, That the Defendant does not repeat again with his misunderstanding.

Considering the favorable circumstances in which the facts are being considered, and taking into account the age, sex, family environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, the means and consequence of the crime, and the conditions of the punishment as shown in the arguments, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc., as set forth in the text.