When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On October 1, 2017, the Defendant: (a) in the light of C’s clothes located in Tonju City B around October 1, 2017, the Defendant was faced with the difficulties of gathering the clothing located in the sales stand of the Defendant’s her son D (n, 7 years of age). In that sense, the Defendant was in demand for an apology from the injured party due to the Defendant’s her head (n, 40 years of age) who is a customer (n, n, n, and g years of age) who was taking the clothing of the clothing.

However, the Defendant refused to go against the victim and expressed his desire to do so; and

As it is, “Sagle” refers to the purport of the victim’s clothes, with the face of the victim being taken by the victim, was expressed in the body of the victim, and the face of the victim was expressed.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, such as the impairment of saves, gymology, gymnasium, etc., on the right side, which requires treatment for about 14 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. CCTV images;

1. The defendant of the victim's photograph on the part of the damage was the victim's price first, and the victim was able to display his arms in response thereto, and there was no intention to inflict an injury on the victim.

The argument is asserted.

The following facts are acknowledged according to evidence adopted and investigated by this Court, in particular CCTV images.

㉠ 피고인의 왼쪽 어깨와 피해자의 오른쪽 어깨가 가깝고 피고인의 오른쪽 어깨와 피해자의 왼쪽 어깨가 먼 상태로 피고인과 마주 서 있던 피해자가 먼저 오른손에 진 분홍색 옷을 든 채로 자신의 오른쪽 어깨 위로 손을 올렸다가 피고인의 왼쪽 어깨와 얼굴 방향으로 진 분홍색 옷을 내려치듯이 휘둘러 피고인이 왼쪽 얼굴 부위를 위 옷으로 덮듯이 맞게 되었다( 영상시간 05:11 :52PM). ㉡ 이에 피고인이 오른손에 연분홍색 옷을 손에 쥔 채로 자신의 오른쪽 어깨 앞 얼굴 높이로 손을 올린 다음 피해자의 얼굴이 있는 왼쪽 앞 방향으로 1회 휘두르고( 영상시간 05:11 :53PM), 다시...