However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On January 28, 2013, at around 06:50, the Defendant driving a C-wing truck, and driving the C-wing F-F-F-F-P-P-P-P-P-P-P-P-P-P-P-P-P-P-P-P-P-P-P-P-P-P-P-P-P-P-P-P-P-P-P-P-P-P-P-P-P-

From this point of view, the victim E (year 71) was crossing without permission from the opposite line, and the defendant was dried, so in such a case, the person engaged in driving of the motor vehicle had a duty of care to safely drive the steering and steering the steering and steering gear by accurately manipulating the steering and steering gear.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not discover the victim who is crossing the road due to the negligence of driving the road due to negligence without neglecting the front city, and caused the victim to die by shocking the victim with the front part of the cargo vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. The actual survey report on traffic accidents, and on-site evidence and photographs of the traffic accident;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning autopsys;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents in the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and selection of

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) (Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) (Article 62 (1) (Article 62 (1) (Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution)