중개수수료
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or each entry in Gap evidence 2, Gap evidence 3, and Eul evidence 6 may be admitted by taking into account the whole purport of the pleadings.
The Plaintiff is a real estate broker who operates the "D Licensed Real Estate Agent Office" in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si C and 105.
B. On January 30, 2015, the Defendant entered into a sales contract with Diplomatic Co., Ltd. to sell KRW 4,200,000,000 of the price for the sale of KRW 563.1 square meters (hereinafter “instant real estate”) in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si (hereinafter “instant real estate”). The “land sales contract” and “the confirmation and description of the object of brokerage” [III] (hereinafter collectively “instant sales contract”) written in the process include L of the office of the Plaintiff and H Licensed Real Estate Agent. As to brokerage remuneration, “the time when the brokerage remuneration is paid shall be in accordance with the agreement between the practicing licensed real estate agent and the client, and if the agreement is not reached, the payment of brokerage remuneration shall be terminated, revoked, and the brokerage remuneration shall be paid (Article 8).” With respect to the amount of brokerage remuneration and actual expenses as well as the calculation details of the brokerage remuneration, the Defendant stated “370,500,800,800 won, 300,5008 won.
C. On April 3, 2015, the Defendant received full payment of the purchase price from Multi-learning Co., Ltd., a purchaser of the instant land, and completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the instant real estate to Multi-learning Co., Ltd. on the same day.
2. Summary of the parties' arguments;
A. The plaintiff received a request from the defendant for brokerage to sell the real estate of this case from the defendant and concluded a sales contract for the real estate of this case between the defendant and multi-learning. Thus, the defendant has concluded a sales contract for the real estate of this case. Thus, the defendant has agreed upon the plaintiff at the time of the preparation of the sales