도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. Around 04:40 on October 20, 2012, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) driven a vehicle of e-ray of e-owned e-mail owned by D, the Defendant’s seat, in the state of under the influence of the alcohol concentration of blood alcohol, from around 5 km to the front line of the Heak-type funeral hall located in the site of the short-term short-term town in the city of the original city of the original state.
2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury caused by Dangerous Driving) and the Road Traffic Act are those who are engaged in driving of a vehicle in the Alley test.
The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), driven the said vehicle in a state where it is difficult to drive the vehicle normally due to the foregoing difficulties in driving, and driven the vehicle in a two-lane radius from the surface of the main station.
At that time, the victim C(the age of 44) stops in the FRano-tensiond typer vehicle at the same time, and was in operation of the vehicle machinery, but the driver did not drive the vehicle, and there was a duty of care to prevent the accident by driving safely.
Nevertheless, the Defendant was negligent in driving in a state where normal operation is difficult as seen above, and caused the front part of the front part of the said part of the said part of the vehicle in the said part of the Aranotension-type motor vehicle, and caused the damage to the damaged vehicle by the shocking the damaged vehicle, thereby having the victim’s left shoulder.
As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as catitis that requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment due to negligence in the above business, and damaged the catus to cover KRW 287,000, such as exchanging the catus with the catus.
Summary of Evidence
1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;
1. Statement to C by the police;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to reports on detection of drivers, reports on risk driving, medical certificates, and written estimates;
1. Relevant provisions concerning facts constituting an offense;