The defendant is the actual operator of D (State) in Namdong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City C.

From April 1, 2014, the Defendant and the victim (State) F, G (State), the actual operator of the Defendant and the victim (State), from around April 1, 2014, ordered D (State) to place an order for the supply of Guide on G (State). In D (State), upon receiving an order from G (State), the victim supplied Guide to the victim, and the victim agreed to pay the said Guide to G (State) by receiving the above payment from the injured party.

Around May 2014, according to the above agreement, the victim ordered Guideology to G (State) and supplied D (State) and I with D (State), and the victim paid D (State) the price of KRW 800,340,000 (I) the price of the Guideology of KRW 713,634,635) to G (State), while G (State) was required to pay the above price of KRW 150,000,000,000 (State) from the damaged person to D (State), as there is no good reason to pay the price in full, and it was paid KRW 130,000,000 on December 12, 19, and around 300,000 on around 30,000.

In the past, there was a crisis of insolvency due to aggravation of the financial situation.

G (State) The actual operator of G(H) around the 30th of the same month refers to the Defendant who received advance payment from the Defendant (State) so that the Defendant may not pay the outstanding amount. The outstanding amount will be repaid in the future.

"......... the victim company's private person F also made advance payments to D (State) and made transactions.

“.....”

From H, the Defendant had been aware of the risk of not receiving approximately 43,634,635 won of the above amount of the old amount of the G (713,634,635 won of the old amount - 280,000,000 won of the old amount) in the crisis of the foregoing payment of G (State), and had been willing to receive the above amount of the payment from the victim who is the customer of G (State) at the above D office on the same day, that “h from H was a frank.”

The test is to send 300,000,000 won as advance payment.