사문서위조등
The defendant shall publicly announce the summary of the judgment of innocence of this case.
1. On October 8, 2002, the facts constituting the facts constituting the facts charged, such as those remitted 30 million won from C on October 8, 2002, the Defendant was aware of the victim C (the age of 62) who was employed as a public official for viewing in South Korea on or around February 1999, and maintained an internal relationship with the deceased victim C (the age of 62). On December 2001, the Defendant retired from office and operated the apartment guard and cleaning service company in Seoul.
On October 8, 2002, the Defendant received a remittance of KRW 30 million to a new bank transaction D deposit account under the name of the Defendant, on the ground that the Defendant provided that the Defendant would have repaid 30 million won as the need for funds to participate in the apartment cleaning and service bidding, if the Defendant borrowed 30 million won as the end of the bid.
On November 30, 2002, the Defendant withdrawn the above money from time to time to time and used it individually.
On May 14, 2008, the defendant has been working as the management office of Gyeyang-gu E since 2007, including the facts that he received a certificate of personal seal impression from C.
On October 28, 2007, the Defendant borrowed and used a bank transaction G deposit passbook in the name of the victim’s father and F, and requested the Defendant to deposit KRW 576,600,000 in the “I Service Center” in the “I Service Center” nearby H management to receive KRW 576,60,00 from the “I Service Center” in the “I Service Center,” which is to be used in the above shopping mall management office and to return KRW 676,00,000 to H and deliver the difference to H and deposit KRW 10,000 in the above account.
H remitted 2 million won to the above deposit account in the course of remitting 100,000 won to the above deposit account, the Defendant: (a) deposited in full and used the money; and (b) asked H to return the money, the Defendant stated that the F’s handling of the said illegal act was made; (c) on January 21, 2008, H submitted a petition to the competent Pakistan Police station on April 23, 2008, and was deemed as the crime of embezzlement of stolen property; and (d) the suspension of indictment was imposed on the relation of staying in China.
On May 8, 2008, the Defendant gave arbitration to H and the victim, and agreed on May 8, 2008, on the condition that the victim remitted two million won to H on behalf of F, and the victim.