On April 9, 2015, the Defendant, at around 16:00, stopped and started from the bus stops in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government in order to load passengers at the bus stops in front of the Eunpyeong Police Station, despite the Defendant’s duty to safely drive buses so that passengers do not get out or get out of the buses, the Defendant violated the duty to drive safety, such as allowing passengers to go out of the bus without checking whether or not there are passengers who are likely to get out of the bus stops or prepare for getting out of the bus.

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, it can be acknowledged that the defendant stopped at a bus stop and boarded the passengers, and that female passengers, who were sitting on the back of the bus stop, did so in order to leave the right side to the passage, and that they were seated above the victim E, and the victim was injured by the need for three weeks of medical treatment.

However, in light of the movement of other passengers in the bus that the bus driven by the defendant started at the stop, the defendant was rapidly launched at the time.

It is difficult to do so.

Even on the operation log of the bus, the urgency was not recorded.

At the time of the accident, the victim did not clearly state whether the defendant was at the time of the accident, and testified to the effect that the passenger who was on board at the time was not at the time of the accident was not at the time of the accident.

Article 48 of the Road Traffic Act prohibits any violation of the duty of safe driving by driving at a speed or in a manner that may cause any danger or impediment to others.

However, in this case, in addition to the fact that passengers go beyond the victim, the defendant who was the driver solely by the evidence of the prosecutor alone violated the duty of safe driving

It is insufficient to conclude it.

Passengers are injured.