2. The judgment of the defendant recognized each of the crimes of this case and reflected, recovered damage to the victim of the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (the measures not to be taken after an accident), the blood alcohol concentration of the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (the blood alcohol concentration) was not high, and the defendant did not have any significant criminal record in relation to each of the crimes of this case.

However, even though the defendant committed the violation of the Road Traffic Act (not taking measures after the accident), the defendant committed the violation of the Road Traffic Act (not taking measures after the accident) in only a week from the person, and the court below seems to have reduced the fine of the summary order issued to the defendant in consideration of the above favorable circumstances. In addition, considering the motive, circumstance, means and result of each of the crimes in this case, the situation before and after the crime, the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, other records and arguments, the punishment imposed by the court below is too unreasonable, even considering the favorable circumstances as seen earlier.

The defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.