성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On July 1, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of five million won for a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Arranging Commercial Sex Acts, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court on July 1, 2015, and operates “C” on the sixth floor of B building in Cheongju-si.
From March 2016 to December 6, 2016, the Defendant employed D, etc. within the aforementioned “C” and had the said female employees engage in sexual intercourse with an unspecified number of male customers, and paid 70,000 won out of 130,000 won to the said female employees, and made it an act of arranging sexual traffic, etc. in a manner of making their own profit.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect against D, E, or F;
1. Report on internal investigation and on-site situations, investigation report (the confirmation of money, valuables, etc. acquired by a person under investigation due to the principal offense;
1. Application of each existing statute referred to in subparagraphs 1 and 2, of seized evidence;
1. Article 19 (2) 1 and Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, concerning facts constituting an offense, and Articles 19 (2) 1 and 25 of the same Act, and selection of imprisonment;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;
1. Protective observation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;
1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;
1. Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;
1. The elements of sentencing unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order: the same crime has been committed even though there was a record of being punished by a fine for the same kind of crime. o favorable sentencing factors are recognized as erroneous and reflectivity. o other factors of sentencing under Article 51 of the Criminal Act are determined as ordered by considering the following as a whole: