A. When misunderstanding the facts and legal principles, the Defendant, at the time of misunderstanding the victim’s misunderstanding, merely took the victim’s hand in order to prevent a dangerous act, such as the use of a deadly weapon, etc., and the Defendant’s act is a justifiable act that does not go against the party’s defense or social norms to defend the victim’s unfair infringement against C, and thus, illegal.

B. The sentence of the lower court that is unfair in sentencing (2 million won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

가. 사실 오인 및 법리 오해 주장에 관한 판단 피해자 F은 수사기관에서부터 원심 법정에 이르기까지 일관되어 ‘C 은 소리를 지르며 피해자를 밀쳤고, 피고인은 피해자를 치면서 넘어뜨렸으며, 넘어진 피해자를 피고인이 목을 조르고 C이 발로 걷어찼다’ 는 취지로 진술하고 있고( 증거기록 18, 26 쪽, 공판기록 71 쪽), C도 원심 법정에서 ‘ 넘어져 있는 피해자를 발로 한 대 걷어 찬 거는 있다’ 는 취지로 증언한 점( 공판기록 96 쪽), 당시 임의 동행으로 경찰서에 가서 찍은 피해자의 상처 부위에 대한 사진 등을 종합하여 보면, 피고인은 C과 공동하여 피해자를 폭행하고 상해를 가한 사실을 충분히 인정할 수 있다.

In addition, the defendant argued that he was a legitimate defense or a legitimate act in the court below, and the court below rejected the above assertion in the third page of the court below's decision.

The defendant's assertion on this part is not reasonable, since there are reasonable grounds for the judgment of the court below that the judgment of the court below was clearly erroneous or that the argument leading to the acknowledgement of facts is considerably unfair due to the violation of logical and empirical rules.

B. It is recognized that the defendant has no record of punishment for the same crime and the degree of injury suffered by the victim is relatively minor.

(b).