When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On September 2, 2014, at around 23:15, the Defendant: (a) expressed a desire to pay the alcohol value to the head of the police station affiliated with the Daegu East-gu Police Station D branch of D branch of D branch of D branch of D branch of D branch of D branch of D branch of D branch of Dong-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, upon receiving a report of 112 on the drinking value; and (b) made a behavior that seems to have shown the above E’s eye due to his finger, and threatened him of the behavior that he seems to be in drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 report handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each police statement protocol to E and F;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not correspond to the defendant's liability for the reason of sentencing. However, the defendant's primary offender is the defendant's primary offender, taking into account the following circumstances, such as the motive, circumstance, means and method of the crime in this case, circumstances before and after the crime in this case, and other circumstances such as the defendant's age, sexual behavior, career, environment, etc.