On October 17, 2018, the Defendant driven the above car at around 12:00, and led to a road near the entrance distance of Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon to a deep-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong.

The location is a narrow road that is only 5.03 meters in width of the 1st round line without a median line. Since it is possible for the Defendant who is engaged in driving service to proceed along the opposite direction of the 2nd round line to the 5.03m road near the village, the vehicle from the opposite direction of the 2nd half of the road is likely to proceed to the part of the road. Therefore, the Defendant is obliged to pay a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by properly operating steering devices

In particular, the defendant was found at a distance of not less than 20 meters from the Ethtoba driven by the victim D (80 years of age) in the opposite direction that the victim D is proceeding to the driver's car in the direction of the defendant's proceeding. In such cases, first, the defendant has a duty of care to prevent the accident by avoiding the collision with the driver who is suitable for the horn and accurately manipulating the steering gear when the distance comes to a close.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not take the above measures to avoid the collision with the above Orala, and proceeded as it is, and did so, the left part of the victim's operation with the upper part of the driver's car operated by the Defendant and the pentar part.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the death of the said victim by occupational negligence in the G Hospital emergency room located in Seo-gu, Daejeon, which was being treated back at around 08:04 on October 19, 2018.

2. Defendant’s assertion and judgment

A. The Defendant’s assertion is driving on the road on which the Defendant’s vehicle is located beyond the center line indicated in the Ghana, where the Defendant was driven by the Defendant while driving on the ceiling.