(a) Outline of the rearrangement project - Project name: G redevelopment and rearrangement project (hereinafter referred to as “instant project”): Defendant - Project site: The date of public inspection and announcement on the rearrangement plan: November 15, 2006 - Public announcement on the first public announcement on the implementation plan of the project on May 21, 2008 (date of May 22, 2012): JJ (date of June 22, 2012) public announcement on the implementation plan of the Nam-gu Busan Metropolitan City (date of June 16, 2015): The date of adjudication on expropriation: The date of this adjudication: August 20, 2015.

(1) Plaintiffs A, B, D, and E are the owners of residential buildings in the instant improvement zone as indicated below.

Plaintiff

Since November 15, 2006, the date of public inspection and announcement of the improvement plan, the address of residential buildings (Yansan-gu), A L 109.04 B M 53.42 D 73.26 D 162 D 160.74 Plaintiff A, B, and E had been continuously residing in each of the above buildings from August 24, 2010 to March 16, 2015, the date of expropriation decision.

(2) Plaintiff C owns No. 101 among the buildings indicated in the attached Table 3 list located in the instant improvement zone, and Plaintiff F owns No. 103 among the same buildings.

The details of the building stated in the list Nos. 101 and 103 of the real estate register No. 103 as "multi-family housing and neighborhood living facilities", and the building register is written as "multi-family housing and neighborhood living facilities", and the use of the section for exclusive use from December 29, 1984 to the present.

Plaintiff

C On August 5, 1992, Plaintiff F, on June 1, 1995, filed a move-in report with each of the above No. 103 on August 5, 1992, and the above Plaintiffs’ resident registration was not transferred until the date of the above decision of acceptance.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 6, 8 through 11, 13 (including each number, hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence No. 1, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Summary of the parties' arguments

A. The Plaintiffs are owners of residential buildings in the instant improvement zone.