However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 29, 2018, no one may lend the means of access necessary for electronic financial transactions to another person, however, the Defendant, from a person who is the head of the B Company C at a non-place where it is located, he/she would allow him/her to use the B Company C’s check and pay KRW 800,000 if he/she deposits the amount of KRW 6 million to the relevant account. 3 days later, he/she heard that he/she would send the check to the house, and then, thereafter, he/she violated the Electronic Financial Transactions Act by lending one check card linked to the F Bank account (Account Number G) in the name of the Defendant to the person who was unaware of his/her name in front of D’s pharmacy at Gyangyangyang-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning details of transactions and details of transactions;

1. Article 49 (4) 2 and Article 6 (3) 2 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor as a matter of choice (the criminal records of the accused, the nature of the crime in this case, circumstances of the crime, etc.);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2 or more of the Criminal Act;