However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol on May 7, 2014 (the issuance of a summary order of a fine of KRW 1.5 million at the Suwon Friwon on May 16, 2014), driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol on November 6, 2014 (the issuance of a summary order of KRW 2 million at the Suwon Friwon Friwon on December 2, 2014), and violating Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act on at least two occasions.

On April 9, 2018, the Defendant driven a low-priced car on the front side of Suwon-si C in a state of alcohol content of 0.154% during blood transfusion at around 22:36.

As a result, the Defendant, who violated the duty of prohibition on driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol in violation of this duty.

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. E statements;

1. A traffic accident report and a photograph;

1. Blucs cambling CDs;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Records of judgment: Application of an inquiry letter, investigation report (former and conclusive) and Acts and subordinate statutes, such as criminal history;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The crime of this case on the ground of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act was committed by the Defendant, who had had a record of driving under drinking not less than twice, and the nature of the crime was not less than that of the Defendant, but not less than that of the Defendant, even though the Defendant had shocked prior vehicles at the time of driving of the instant drinking. In light of the fact that the Defendant was in a state of drinking at the time

In this case, the driving of the drinking of this case did not have a certain danger.

I seem to appear.

However, the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and divided his mistake, the defendant has no record of punishment for the suspension of execution or more until now, and the age, sex, environment of the defendant.