성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the punishment imposed by the lower court (one year and six months of imprisonment, 40 hours of order to complete sexual assault treatment programs, 2 years of disclosure information, and Confiscation) is too unreasonable.
2. The circumstances are that the Defendant, who made a judgment, led to the confession of the instant crime and reflects his mistake, and that the Defendant does not have the same criminal power, etc. are favorable to the Defendant.
However, the crime of this case was committed in consideration of the following: (a) the Defendant taken a sexual intercourse with the victim after the victim was killed in the victim; (b) used it to withdraw 40 million won from the victim; and (c) used it to do so; (d) the nature of the crime is heavy; (c) the mental impulse caused by the crime of this case seems to have significantly high degree; (d) the Defendant did not make any effort to recover damage; and (e) other various sentencing conditions indicated in the argument of this case, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family environment, etc., the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable.
Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.