임금
1. The defendant's appeal is all dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
1. In addition to the purport of the argument in Gap evidence No. 1 as to the cause of the claim, the plaintiffs were employed by the defendant from March 26, 2013 to July 28, 2013 and were in charge of the production of the D company. The defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff A the amount of KRW 1,00,000 for June 26, 2013, for the amount of KRW 1,780,000 for the amount of KRW 1,780,00 for the portion of July 2, 2013, for the amount of KRW 2,560,000 for the portion of KRW 90,00 for the plaintiff B, and for the amount of KRW 2,560,00 for the portion of KRW 1,660 for the portion of July 26, 2013 to KRW 2,560,00 for delay damages from July 28, 2013 to KRW 301 for the above portion of the Labor Standards.
2. As to the defendant's defense, the defendant raised a defense to the effect that since the products examined by the plaintiffs during the employment period caused damage to the amount of KRW 34 million to the company, the plaintiffs should waive all remaining wages, and they could not pay the above amount. Thus, the evidence submitted in the records of this case alone, which alone caused damage to the defendant due to the plaintiffs' negligence of examination.
The defendant's above defense is not accepted because it is not sufficient to recognize that the plaintiffs renounced their wages that they should receive, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.
3. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claims against the defendant are justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the defendant's appeal against the plaintiffs is dismissed in its entirety as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.