However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2015. 7. 11. 00:19경 울산시 울주군 온산읍 덕신리 산 208-1 온산로에서 B K5 승용차를 운전하던 중 피고인의 차 뒤에서 경적을 울리며 상향등을 깜빡거리는 차량이 피해자 C(65세)가 운전하는 D 택시인 것으로 오인하고 순간적으로 화가 나, 중앙선을 침범하여 피해자의 택시 앞으로 앞지르기를 한 후 피해자 택시 앞에서 급제동하고, 피해자가 이를 피해 1차로로 진행하자 같은 차로로 뒤따라 가 다시 그 앞에서 급제동하고, 계속하여 피해자보다 앞서 진행하다가 다시 피해자의 택시 앞에서 급제동함으로써 피해자의 생명 또는 신체에 어떠한 위해를 가할 듯한 태도를 보였다.

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim with a dangerous object, which is a motor vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A written statement of C and E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to vehicle internal photographs and investigation reports;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the relevant Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. against Criminal Crimes, and Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of intimidation by carrying a deadly weapon);

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act / [Scope of Recommendation] The mitigated range of crimes (Habitual Cumulative Offense, Habitual Intimidation) [Special Mitigation] [Special Mitigation] of the mitigated range (4-1 year)] [Pronouncement Decision] of the Punishment not (Pronouncement Decision] of the Punishment, and the form of act such as blocking and threatening the damaged vehicle with vehicles in operation, etc. However, it is not good that the crime is committed in considerable danger. However, the fact that the punishment is recognized and reflects mistake, the fact that there is no criminal record three times of the fine, the fact that the victim has committed and agreed to commit the crime, the fact that the victim has committed the crime, and other sentencing factors indicated in the record, such as