However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 20, 2017, from around 20:13 to 20:44 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft by carrying a construction work amounting to 2.3 million won in total, including two hundred and sixty thousand won in the market price under the supervision of the victim C in the Southern-si, which was kept under the supervision of the construction site in the construction site, using a cresh in which there is no person at the construction site; (b) one electric water tank in an amount equivalent to 2.50,000 won in the market price in the new building; (c) one electric saw in an amount equivalent to 900,000 won in the market price in the new building; (d) one electric saw in an amount equivalent to 1.60,000 won in the market price in a simplified storage; and (d) two Baber in an amount equivalent to 2.60,000 won in the market price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The punishment as ordered is determined by comprehensively taking into account the following circumstances: (a) the amount of damage is the small amount of punishment having the same same kind of reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act; (b) the Defendant reflects and agrees with the victim; and (c) the Defendant’s age, sex, family relationship, environment, circumstances, and result of the crime; and (d) the circumstances after the crime.