However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 15, 2009, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the Gwangju District Court's Netcheon Branch, and a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for the same crime in the same court on November 17, 2016.

On July 5, 2017, the Defendant driven a C Lastren vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.110 percent in the direction of the first apartment in the direction of approximately 200 meters, from the road before the 1stal of the 1stal of the Yacheon-si, Yacheon-si, Yacheon-si, Yacheon-si, the 1stal of the 1stal of the 1stal of the 4-7thal of the 1stal of the 1stal of the 2017.

As a result, the Defendant was a person who had a driving force under drinking not less than twice, and was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol again.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions indicated in the judgment: Inquiry about criminal history, investigation reports (verification of the same kind of force), and application of the statutes governing summary orders;

1. Relevant legal provisions and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of punishment for a crime, and the selection of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The punishment as ordered shall be determined in order to prevent recidivism in consideration of the defendant's same military power, economic environment, drinking volume of drinking of this case, etc. for the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;