2. Determination is recognized that there was no additional damage, such as the Defendant’s driving distance due to the instant crime and causing a traffic accident, and that there was a family member to support, and that there was an economic difficulty as a basic livelihood recipient from around 2007.

However, the crime of this case was committed by the defendant while under the influence of 0.149% without a driver's license, and it is not easy to say that the defendant was under the influence of 0.149%, and it does not seem that there was an imminent or inevitable circumstance that the defendant should drive without a driver's license at the time of the crime of this case, and the revised Road Traffic Act was a serious crime that may endanger the life and body of himself/herself and others, and the revised Road Traffic Act strengthened criminal punishment by raising the statutory punishment for the crime of violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (a deadly weapons, etc.) from the Busan District Court on May 15, 2012. In full view of all the circumstances such as the defendant's age, environment, family relationship, occupation, etc., the defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware of the fact that he was under the suspension of execution after being sentenced two years of the suspension of execution.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. According to the conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition.