"2018 Highest 2801"

1. On April 5, 2018, the Defendant: (a) found a “D” drinking house operated by the victim C located in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon on April 5, 2018; and (b) obtained the victim’s wrong approval of his/her credit value.

under subsection (1) and (2) of this section, there is a customer in the foregoing drinking house, and the victim is able to do so.

There has been a forum for the chapter.

D. There will not be a house until it will bring about the tenant.

D. “ .................... knicked about approximately 50 minutes, and ....... knicked the table with hand floor.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

2. The Defendant, in response to the refusal of the withdrawal, did not comply with the demand of the injured party to leave the above main points over several occasions at the date, time, and place specified in paragraph 1, but did not comply with such demand. On the same day, at around 22:40 of the same day, the police officers belonging to the Incheon Western Police Station would not leave approximately 10 minutes of the above main points after being dispatched to the said main points, and stayed there.

Accordingly, the defendant did not comply with the request to leave the victim without any justifiable reason.

3. The Defendant, at around 16:50 June 16, 2018, entered the victim C’s main points in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, under the influence of alcohol, and made a request for the victim’s withdrawal several times, would drink within the food point.

“A large voice” and “C” for customers with the above main points.

The death will be discarded.

"Along with the large voice, approximately 30 minutes of the disturbance was avoided, making customers leave the place."

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's main business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each written statement of C;

1. A report on internal investigation (victim C telephone call);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to hear statements from victims;

1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business) and Article 319(2) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the applicable law and the choice of punishment.