From April 24, 1993, the Defendant had been operating a limited partnership C in Gangwon-gun B, Gangwon-do, and D is a person related to the Defendant and the married couple.

The Defendant and D, since October 194, did not have any property aggravated in the financial situation of the company from around 1994, was faced with economic difficulties, such as the issuance of a provisional coefficient for the repayment of the company's obligations, and return it to the cryp for the repayment of the company's obligations, which was in mind to prevent the company's urgent obligations from lending money from the surrounding persons.

1. Fraud;

A. On October 194, the Defendant against the victim E made a false statement to the victim E at the victim E’s residence located in D and Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul on 1994, stating that “If there is any money that our husband and wife would urgently operate with a tourist company at the three sides of Gangwon-do, and if there is any money that would be urgently needed, she would pay 10 million won interest at the end of each month and repay the money.”

However, the Defendant and D did not have any intent or ability to repay, even if they borrowed money from the victim, because they did not have to pay the debt of the said company in return for money due to the lack of any financial circumstance in the management situation of the said company, and thus, they did not have any intent or ability to repay the debt.

The Defendant, in collusion with D, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 10 million from the victim, i.e., KRW 6.5 million from the victim’s seat, KRW 6.5 million from the same place on October 194, 194, KRW 30 million from the same place on the same name as the police officer at the first place on February 1995, and KRW 22 million from the same name as the police officer at the same place on February 195, 195, and KRW 68.5 million from the same name.

B. Around November 18, 1994, the Defendant against the victim G made a false statement to the victim G by stating that “The victim G would use only 4 million won as it is urgently required to prevent the coefficient mark, and make reimbursement without a mold.”

(b).