A seized knife (No. 1) shall be confiscated.

If there is no concern that the exercise of the defendant's right to defense may be seriously disadvantaged within the extent consistent with the facts charged, facts constituting a crime different from those stated in the indictment ex officio may be recognized without changes in the indictment.

(See Supreme Court Decision 2008Do2409 Decided September 11, 2008, etc.). The original facts charged include the fact that the Defendant used a knife, which is a dangerous article, and thereby inflicted an injury on the victim. Even if the Defendant is punished as a special injury crime, it does not pose a substantial disadvantage to the Defendant’s exercise of his/her right to defense. Thus, the Defendant is guilty of a special injury crime, which

At around 16:58 on February 21, 2020, the Defendant was written in F in the “C” office operated by the Defendant in Ansan-si, the victim’s friendship E from the victim’s family-friendly office (the age of 29) or witness D who took place in this court, and in the examination of the Defendant, it is written in F.

In order to pay the unpaid wages in arrears, the knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police's protocol of statement concerning D of the suspect interrogation of the defendant as to the defendant's partial testimony testimony of the witness witness D at the court room (112 declaration and the process of arresting the suspect, the suspect's denial of the crime and the concealment of the crime tool, the victim's hospital), the investigation report (the No. 5 of the evidence list), the statement of the victim at the time of damage (the cell phone of the defendant attached).