2. The judgment of the defendant is based on the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case, and the defendant has no record of being punished for the same kind of crime, but there is a significant social harm by encouraging the people's excessive speculative spirit and undermining their sound labor awareness, and there is a need to strictly punish the illegal game room because it does not eradicate despite continuous control. The defendant's registration of the game game providing business. The crime of installing and operating a game machine again at the same place within about 10 days after the first control, etc. is not good, since the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the punishment of the court below is too unreasonable, considering the various sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, crime motive, means and consequence, circumstances after the crime, etc.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.