However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On November 6, 2012, at around 01:30, the injured Defendant: (a) on the road in front of the Seo-gu Seo-gu Officetel in Gwangju, a passenger car and a traffic accident occurred in the victim E (29 years old); (b) on the ground that the victim reported 112, the victim stated that “whether he is doing so at the present moment, whether he was doing so, flag, flag, and flag, flag,” and the victim’s back head and face were flaged two times with his left hand, and the part of the victim’s back head and face were flaged one time with his flab, and the victim’s part was flabed by drinking, which requires approximately two weeks medical treatment.

2. The Defendant at the above date, time, and place of the obstruction of performance of official duties: (a) the head of Gwangju Western Police Station F District G, who was called upon a 112 report, demanded the said D voluntarily to perform a measurement of blood alcohol content; and (b) said D arbitrarily conducted a 112 patrol vehicle; and (c) said D interfered with the said police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the said G’s 112 report and patrol duties, on the ground that “I will see this dog, shot flap, and flap, flap, flap, and flap, flap, and flap, flap the face part of the said G with the right drinking, and obstructed the said police officer’s lawful performance of duties.

3. The Defendant obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the duty of report and patrol by threatening 112, a police officer, in a size of about 50 cm, which is dangerous goods in the passenger car freight column of the said D driving, when the Defendant taken a cell phone in order to evidence the Defendant’s abusive behavior, etc. at the time and at the above time and at the above place, and by threatening H, in order to cut off the situation at the time and in order to use the Defendant’s abusive behavior, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement of E, G, and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;