The name influents of the organization of telecommunications financing fraud (hereinafter referred to as the “Sishing”), who is the total responsibility of the organization, organized various stages of deceptions, management measures, cash receipt measures, etc., and the members of the organization under the control of deceptions made false statements that they wish to make loans at a low interest rate by misrepresenting an unspecified number of victims by deceiving them from telephone without permission, thereby allowing them to deposit them into the designated account by the victims. The members of the organization under the control measures informed the victims of the location of collecting cash withdrawals and receiving the cash withdrawals, and the account to deposit the withdrawn cash to receive the cash withdrawals. The Defendant and B received the name influsing boxes, the name influssing management measures, and then remitted the cash to the designated account, and received the fee equivalent to 2% of the amount of damage by remitting.

On August 17, 2018, the name under whose name is the book to attract Washington, shall be called to the victim R and shall be named as the F Bank S. agent.

If you supplement the balance by repaying the loan currently used, you may issue the Mussbook up to 18 million won with the low interest rate of 3.9%.

“Along on the same day, the victim made the victim transfer KRW 5 million to the F Bank’s account (Account Number: U) and KRW 11 million to V’s W account (Account Number: X) on the same day, respectively; the Defendant instructed the victim to withdraw the above amount; and the Defendant received prior delivery from the F Bank’s cash payment machine at the F Bank’s cash payment machine located in Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, with his name in accordance with the direction of the winner; and the Defendant was in custody at the F Bank’s cash payment machine at the F Bank’s cash payment machine located in T.

T-name F Bank Postal Card, in cash, withdrawn 5 million won.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim in collusion with the victim B and the person in unsound name.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of the police officers in relation to T, V, and B;

1. Written petition;

1. Pacing;