beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2016.04.29 2016고단427

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Seoul Western District Court on May 26, 2010 and completed the execution of the sentence at the Cheongju Women’s Prison on March 9, 2012.

[2016 Highest 427]

1. On May 4, 2013, the Defendant committed a crime against the victim C: “E” operated by the victim C in Seocheon-gu, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on May 4, 2013; “The number of days from Ilsan to one billion won” is the victim’s penalty for a large amount of money.

The loan of 50 million won shall include 20% interest on the principal and shall be paid in 10,000 won each by 60,000 won.

“A false statement,” etc.

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have engaged in the bond business in the Ilsan, and since there was no need for living expenses, there was no intention or ability to pay money from the injured party even if he borrowed money.

The Defendant received 4,400,000 won remaining after deducting 600,000 won from the damaged person on the one-time side of the same day, and received a total of 215,60,000 won from around that time to July 17, 2013, as shown in the list of crimes in attached Table (1).

2. On April 27, 2013, the Defendant committed the crime against Victim F: (a) from the “H restaurant operated by the Defendant in Y in Yacheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si; (b) the number of days is 1.5 billion won for the victim F who is an employee; and (c) E C also leased KRW 30 million for the supply of a 50 million.

The loan of 50 million won shall include 20% interest on the principal and shall be paid in 10,000 won each by 60,000 won.

“A false statement,” etc.

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have engaged in the bond business in the Ilsan, and since there was no need for living expenses, there was no intention or ability to pay money from the injured party even if he borrowed money.

The Defendant received KRW 5,00,000 from the injured party on the same day, and from June 10, 2013. < Amended by Act No. 11873, Jun. 10, 2013>