beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.08.23 2013고합354

마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)

Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

However, the defendants are individually from the date of this judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are not narcotics handlers.

The Defendants intended to purchase psychotropic drugs-related psychotropic drugs from those who live in the city for the same sex of China (hereinafter “F President”), and conspired to import philopon from the Incheon Port to the Republic of Korea when the F President sent them to the Republic of Korea via a philopon (hereinafter “philopon”).

Around June 9, 2013, the FF president concealed approximately 5.3g (No. 1) of philopon to the next box (Evidence No. 2) in order to make it possible to deliver it to G, who is well aware of the circumstances. G around June 9, 2013, at around 12:00, on board a vehicle box with a philopon concealed at the time of for the same sex of China and entered into the 2 international passenger terminal of Incheon Port No. 200 on June 10, 2013.

The Defendants waiting to receive the said phiphones from the vicinity of the 2 International Passenger Terminal of Incheon Port No. 2 around June 10, 2013, around 14:10 on June 14:10, 2013, at the time of the arrival of the said Wphone 2, the Defendants was waiting to receive the said phiphones from G as above.

As a result, the Defendants conspired with the president of the FF on personal information and imported approximately 5.3g phiphones from China to the Republic of Korea.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Examination protocol of the suspect of G by the prosecution;

1. Report on detection, investigation report (Attachment of A mobile phone Messenssen and telephone conversations), investigation report (Attachment of Kakakao Stockholm photographs stored in B mobile phones), investigation report (verification report on the results of appraisal of seized articles);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records;

1. The Defendants: Articles 58 (1) 6, 4 (1), and 2 subparagraph 3 (b) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc., and Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Discretionary mitigation;