The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant) is the defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff) and the defendant.

A. On March 19, 2009, Defendant Company concluded a service contract with the Plaintiff with the following contents (hereinafter “instant service contract”), and paid KRW 30,000,000 out of the down payment to the Plaintiff on the same day, and the Defendant jointly and severally guaranteed the Defendant Company’s service payment obligation to the Plaintiff.

The name of general terms of contract: E slaughterhouse urban management planning and permission for development activities: daily twenty million won (150,000,000) - The separate term of additional tax: the scope of the tasks conducted by the Plaintiff from March 19, 2009 to March 2009 shall be as follows:

(1) An urban management plan of KRW 40,000, KRW 15,000,00 for the examination of traffic congestion, KRW 15,00,00 for the examination of environmental feasibility, KRW 15,000 for the examination of environmental feasibility, ② The costs, etc. for the construction of civil engineering designs (including surveys) of KRW 15,00,00 for the first type of civil engineering design (including surveys) shall be paid within the scope of the settlement and settlement at the time of the occurrence of the project, such as changes in the area of the separate project (area increase and change in the plan two or more times), and for the construction of access roads, within the scope of the consultation between the Defendant company and the Plaintiff. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 20348, Feb. 1, 2000; Presidential Decree No. 20000, Mar. 20, 2000; Presidential Decree No. 206650, Feb. 8, 2008>

The defendant company was received under the name of the defendant company, and the head of the Breeding Gun after deliberation by the Development and Planning Committee.