beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.01.11 2017가단15147

대여금반환등

Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B shall be KRW 6,500,000 and the interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from September 16, 2017 to the date of complete payment.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the claim against the defendant B

A. The plaintiff, on July 4, 2007, lent KRW 6.5 million to the defendant B, and the above defendant paid KRW 2 million out of the above money until July 30, 2007, and the remaining KRW 4.5 million was agreed to make payment within as soon as possible, but did not pay it. Thus, the plaintiff sought 6.5 million and damages for delay against the above defendant.

(b) Articles 208 (3) 2 and 150 (3) and (1) of the Civil Procedure Act of the applicable provisions of Acts (a judgment made by deeming that the application is made);

2. Determination as to the claim against Defendant C

가. 인정사실 1) 원고는 2007. 3. 27. 피고 C에게 3,000만 원을 이자 월 4%로 정하여 대여하면서 선이자 명목으로 120만 원을 공제하고, 위 피고로부터 위 대여금에 대한 담보로 렉서스 차량을 제공받았다. 2) 이후 원고는 피고 C의 요청에 따라 담보로 제공된 렉서스 차량을 반환하면서, 2007. 9. 4. 위 피고와 사이에 ‘위 피고는 2008. 3. 4.까지 원고에게 3,000만 원을 변제하되, 2007. 9.부터 2008. 2.까지 매월 말일에 500만 원씩 변제한다’는 내용의 약정(이하 ‘이 사건 약정’이라 한다)을 체결하는 한편, 위 피고로부터 롤렉스 시계를 담보로 제공받았다.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 2, 5, and 6, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above facts, Defendant C is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the remainder of KRW 20 million calculated by deducting the total of KRW 10 million from the Plaintiff’s total of KRW 5 million (= KRW 30 million - 5 million - five million - five million - five million - five million - the Plaintiff’s visibility offered as security is equivalent to KRW 19 million, in the absence of special circumstances.