The defendant is a person who is engaged in the operation of urban buses at three times.

On June 23, 2012, the Defendant driven the above bus on June 16:55, and moved ahead of the road in front of the public training center in Gwangju-si to the Nasan apartment from the side of the public training ground, and there was a crosswalk in which signals, etc. are installed.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by safely driving the motor vehicle after checking whether he/she has a person to reduce speed, keep the front door well, and build the crosswalk.

Nevertheless, even though the right-hand signal of the vehicle has been changed to the stop signal and the pedestrian signal has been loaded, the defendant neglected this and continued to proceed with the victim D (W, 56 years old) who crosses the crosswalk from the right-hand side to the left-hand side according to the pedestrian signals, and became into contact with the front door of the city bus driving by the defendant.

The Defendant suffered from injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc., which requires two weeks of medical treatment due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on video recording of closed-circuits of buses or video recording of closed-circuits at the scene of an accident;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (6) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines

1. Penalty fine of 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (50,000 won a day) to attract a workhouse;

1. The instant accident, such as the reason for sentencing under Article 59(1) of the suspended sentence, goes against the mass production of the victim who started walking along the crosswalk when the Defendant moved to a stop signal immediately after the bypass signal of the vehicle was changed to a stop signal.

The degree of injury of the victim is not serious.

The defendant.