If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

On May 27, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive around that time.

"2016 High 1552"

1. On October 6, 2015, the Defendant, against the victim B, posted a letter stating that he/she sold a mobile phone of 4S in the Korean car page among the NAVV and reported this fact to the victim B who contacted the victim B, thereby sending the goods upon deposit of KRW 75,000.

However, the defendant did not have the goods that he sells as above, and even if he receives the price, he did not have the intention or ability to display 4S of the phone.

Ultimately, on October 6, 2015, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 75,000 won from the victim to the corporate bank account in the name of the Defendant, and acquired it by fraud.

2. On October 14, 2015, the Defendant, against the victim D, posted a letter on the sales of LGGGG G-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-owned mobile phones 2 in the NA, and made a false statement to the victim D, who reported and contacted this fact, stating that the Defendant would send the goods upon deposit of KRW 80,000 to the victim D.

However, the defendant did not have the above goods, and even if he received the price of the goods, he did not have the intention or ability to indicate the LGG-pro-pro rata 2 mobile phone.

Ultimately, on October 14, 2015, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 80,000 won from the victim to the bank E account in the name of the Defendant.

“2016 High 1553”

3. On July 27, 2015, the Defendant against the victim F, etc. did not have any goods sold on the Internet, and thus did not have an intent or ability to sell them. As such, the Defendant posted an advertisement on the Internet “Jin High Country” Roster stating that “the sales of gallon 2 mobile phones will be made” on the Internet, and false statement stating that “the Defendant would send the cell phone when depositing the price of the goods to the victim F, who reported it,” the Defendant’s name is the Defendant’s agricultural cooperative.