beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2021.02.05 2020고단1146

사기방조등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Seized evidence No. 1 shall be confiscated.

The amount of KRW 190,00,00,000, out of the items 2 and 3 of seized evidence.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, on October 2020, 2020, sent 150,000 won per case to the account designated by us, by entering the debtor's personal information into the cash receipt of instructions from the officer of the scam financial fraud (one named " Boscam") who came to know of the name through the mobile phone advertising message from the early police officer of 2020, and entering the debtor's personal information from another person at the time of cash withdrawal, and then transferring the cash without using the passbook to the account designated by us.

“In receipt of the proposal to the effect that the above proposal was a part of the telephone financial fraud crime, the proposal was accepted with the awareness that the above proposal was a part of the telephone financial fraud crime, and the victim was sent with cash after receiving the victim’s consent in accordance with the direction of the person who was not injured.

1. On October 7, 2020, a member of the telephone financial fraud assistance in the name of fraud is allowed to borrow a loan up to 40 million won at a low interest rate by phone call from the victim B to the victim B.

“A victim’s consent by proposing to the purport that “the act of applying for a loan to another card company in the status of borrowing money from the existing E may be subject to criminal punishment because it violates laws and regulations.”

In order to be exempted from criminal punishment and to obtain a loan from D, a false statement was made to the effect that “8,601,000 won loaned by E shall be immediately disposed of in cash, and only the E employee who sent to E shall deliver cash.”

However, in fact, since the above person was not an employee of the financial institution, there was no intention or ability to compensate the victim for the loan or the money received from the victim to the financial institution.

Since then, according to the above order of an employee to engage in telephone financial fraud, the Defendant saw “G” food in Seosan City F on October 7, 2020, as if the Defendant was an employee of E, while doing so.