2. The judgment is based on the following facts: (a) the Defendant recognized all of his criminal acts; and (b) some victims (the victims of the attempted larceny) expressed their intent not to punish the Defendant.

On the other hand, however, the defendant has been punished for the same kind of crime several times, and in particular, even during the period of repeated crime due to the last punishment, the nature and circumstances of the crime are not very good, the risk of recidivism is assessed to be high, the victims' damage is not recovered in all, there is no change in circumstances after the judgment of the court below, and the circumstances favorable to the defendant appear to have been determined by the court below in consideration of all the sentencing conditions in the records, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, the background of the crime in this case, and the circumstances before and after the crime, etc., the above arguments by the defendant cannot be accepted, since the sentence imposed by the court below is too too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.