When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

From around October 2012 to October 2013, the Defendant argued to the effect that, on October 13, 2013, when the Defendant had a good appraisal with the victim, the Defendant had a victim’s smartphone and was asked to return several times from the victim, but the victim refused to return the smartphone, and that the victim would be released from the outside by the Defendant, such as the victim’s flag, photograph, etc. stored in the smartphone.

As a result, the Defendant reported to the purport that “the mother of the Defendant is unfairly receiving the basic livelihood supply” while continuing disputes with the victim, and reported the misconduct of the Defendant who operates the mobile phone sales store to the KT Audit Office.

On September 30, 2014, the Defendant sent a mobile phone text message to the victim’s mobile phone (C) using the Defendant’s mobile phone at an insular location at around 18:30, the Defendant sent the victim’s mobile phone text message to “Ne male and female seated, whether many male and female seated,” and on October 11:57, at an insular location at around 11:57: (a) sent a mobile phone text message to “I see if you wish to do so when you do so; and (b) sent a mobile phone message to “D would see that you would see if you want to do so;” and (c) asked the victim of a mobile phone by asking the victim of any of the following methods at around 23:54, December 22, 2014, as if you want to see, “I see, I see,” and “I see,” the victim’s new phone text message to be sent to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Prosecution B with respect to this case.