If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

At around 21:50 on February 6, 2020, the Defendant: (a) reported 112 at a singing shop located in Yongsan-si, Yongsan-si, a member of Changwon-si; and (b) recommended the Defendant to return home, calculating the drinking value from the security guards D, etc. affiliated with the Mapo-dong Police Station C police box, etc., called “Isson, but was under the influence of alcohol,” and breadd the Defendant’s voice that “Isson, but, at the same time, Isnish the Defendant’s face.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to a photograph by cutting a bar cinematographic image;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Baspiting or spiting the face of police officers on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is not suitable for a provisional payment order.

However, the defendant recognizes and reflects the facts of crime.

It seems to have been under the influence of alcohol to the extent that the investigation is impossible.

There is no record of crime that has been punished for the same crime or of a fine.

In addition, the sentencing conditions, such as the age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances, circumstances after the crime, etc., shall be determined as per the order.