Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a cargo vehicle B with a ton of 1 ton.

On June 3, 2019, the defendant driving the above cargo vehicle around 17:20, and led D's front road located in Busan Jung-gu C to the F market from the side of the E market.

Since there is a road without signal apparatus, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving the crosswalk, such as making a temporary stop before the crosswalk so as not to obstruct the crossing of the pedestrian or endanger the pedestrian, when the driver of the vehicle is able to live well in the surrounding area and the pedestrian is travelling along the crosswalk.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so as to keep the part on the right side of the victim G, which walked on the right side of the crosswalk from the left side of the course due to negligence, and received the right side side of the said cargo vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim to suffer injury, such as fluoral salt, which requires treatment for about two weeks by occupational negligence as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual survey report on traffic accidents;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (including submission of medical certificates);

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (6) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;