However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[Criminal Power] On August 4, 201, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving) in the Daejeon District Court’s branch court.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Around 15:27 May 30, 2020, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) driven a DK7 car under the influence of alcohol content of approximately 0.067% from the section of about 2km to the road front of the “C” restaurant located in the “C” restaurant located in the public city B, if distributed in the public city from the front of the 15:27 public city, the Defendant driven a DK7 car under the influence of alcohol content of about 110 meters from the 2km section of the school principal and the 110-day road

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the duty of prohibition on driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice.

2. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) is a person engaged in driving DK7 cars.

On May 30, 2020, the Defendant driven the said car with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.067% 0.067% while under the influence of alcohol around 15:27 on May 30, 2020, and, at the time of official week, he proceeded with a three-dimensional distance of 110% as a school grade 1 to the Ethical area.

At the same time, the passenger car of the victim F (ma, 44 years old) driving was stopped according to the stop signal. Thus, the driver had a duty of care to look at the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and duty of care to prevent the accident in advance by accurately manipulating the steering gear.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant received the rear part of the said K7 vehicle with the front part of the said K7 vehicle due to negligence, which was driven without due diligence.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by negligence in the above business, injury to the victim H (the 65 years old), and victim I (the 42 years old age), such as salt ties and tensions, which require approximately two-day medical treatment, and the victim J (the South and the 6 years old age) suffered injury such as salt ties and tensions in the part where the detailed elbs of the arms that require approximately two-day medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's oral statement;