However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 13, 2018, the Defendant driven a B-hand car with approximately KRW 500 meters alcohol concentration at a section of approximately 0.143%, while under the influence of mandatory insurance, from a section of approximately 500 meters from the old gate to the front gate of a blostic acid in the Republic of Korea, which was located in the area of Eup/Myeon, due to the flow of 22:21 on April 13, 2018.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on driving drinking, and the application of each mandatory insurance statute;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 48-2 (2) 2 and Article 46 (2) 2 of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act, the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act, and selection of imprisonment with labor;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the Order to Provide community service and attend lectures, the driving of drinking alcohol, the measurement of drinking, and the suspension of the execution of sentence: Provided, That the same kind of criminal records is the previous criminal records before and after 2009, and they do not have the previous criminal records of drinking, and the crime of this case is reflected in comprehensive consideration;