According to the records, the defendants appealed against the judgment of the court of first instance and asserted only unfair sentencing as the grounds for appeal.

In such a case, the Defendants’ assertion to the effect that the lower court erred in the misapprehension of legal principles as to the establishment of the crime of bodily injury cannot be a legitimate ground for appeal.

In addition, examining various circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records, such as the Defendants’ age, behavior intelligence and environment, relationship with the victims, motive means and consequence of the instant crime, etc., even if considering the circumstances asserted in the grounds of appeal, it cannot be deemed that the lower court’s sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for 11 years and 16 years against Defendant C is extremely unfair.

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.