2. The circumstances favorable to the defendant are also favorable to the defendant, such as the confession of the fact of crime by the defendant, the fact that the victim K and the defendant agreed smoothly with the victim, and the deposit of some money for the victim E.

However, in light of the method and content of the instant crime, etc., the nature of the crime is inferior, the Defendant did not agree with the victim E, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment on September 3, 201 with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective deadly weapon, etc.) at the Changwon District Court’s branch on September 3, 201, and completed the execution of the instant punishment at the Busan Detention House on December 3, 2011 during the prison prison, and the Defendant committed the instant crime within three years from the end of the prison prison, and the Defendant had several records of punishment by violence, etc., taking full account of the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant case such as the Defendant’s age, occupation, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.