2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

A. On February 18, 2014, the network C (hereinafter referred to as “the network”) driven by a driving of DOtoba (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) around 21:30, while driving a road in front of FOtoba (hereinafter “Atobaba”), which is located in E when permanent residence, with a creative vibration level, from the west-distance room, in order to overtake the HH truck (hereinafter “Defendant”) driven by G beyond the center line of the yellow yellow-ray, proceed to the opposite lane, and turn to the left from the intersection without the signal apparatus of the Defendant (hereinafter “instant intersection”), the part on the left side of the Defendant’s vehicle was received by the Plaintiff Ortoba with the right-hand hand of the Plaintiff.

Plaintiff

Otoba received walls on the opposite lane due to the above shock, and the deceased died due to a acute climatic hemosis around 13:00 on February 28, 2014.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

The plaintiffs are the parents of the deceased, and the defendant is the insurer who has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the defendant vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 7, 11, Eul evidence 1 and 2 (including branch numbers, hereinafter the same), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiffs' assertion that the accident of this case occurred due to the error that the driver G of the defendant vehicle did not temporarily stop on the stop line while making a left-hand turn turn, and that the left-hand turn-hand turn-hand turn-hand turn-hand turn-hand turn-hand turn-hand turn-out conflict with the plaintiff Orala. Thus, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiffs who are the heir of the deceased

3. According to the reasoning of the evidence Nos. 11, 12, and 1, G, prior to the occurrence of the instant accident, knew that the Plaintiff Oraba was followed by the Defendant’s vehicle. Although the instant intersection had a white stop line, G does not temporarily stop and proceeds without temporarily suspending, and G turn to the left at the intersection of the instant case.