2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Therefore, only the defendant filed an appeal against the part against which the judgment of the court of first instance lost, and the plaintiff did not file an appeal separately, so the scope of the judgment of this court is limited to the claim for the amount of unpaid goods among the judgment of the court of first instance

2. According to the reasoning of the lower judgment as to the claim for the amount of unpaid goods, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the amount of 36,713,247 won (66,713,247 won - 30,000 won) and damages for delay.

The plaintiff is a company engaged in manufacturing and wholesale and retailing of textile, yarns, raw yarns, etc., and the defendant is a company engaged in manufacturing and wholesale and retailing of textile products.

B. The Plaintiff supplied the Defendant with the original goods, etc. from around 2007 to October 2013.

C. Around June 30, 2012, the Defendant paid KRW 66,713,247 to the Plaintiff totaled KRW 66,713,247. On the same day, the Defendant paid KRW 30 million to the Plaintiff.

[Ground of Recognition] A without dispute, entry of Gap's 1 through 3, part of Eul's evidence No. 1, entry of Eul's evidence No. 2, the purport of whole pleadings

3. The Defendant’s assertion argues that the Defendant did not have an obligation to pay the said unpaid amount to the Plaintiff, on the grounds that: (a) the Plaintiff agreed to pay the Plaintiff KRW 36,713,247 out of the total amount of the unpaid amount of KRW 66,713,247 up to the time of June 30, 2012, to reduce the remainder of the unpaid amount of KRW 36,713,247.

the witness C of the first instance trial, written in the evidence 2 to 10 of this title (including the number of each number), and